2026 Conference Agenda Report (CAR)

19 Frequently Asked Questions for NA Members

Table of Contents

1 What is the Conference Agenda Report (CAR) and why is it important?

The Conference Agenda Report (CAR) is one of the primary publications distributed before each World Service Conference (WSC). It is released a minimum of 180 days before the conference (with translated versions released 150 days prior) and contains proposals, motions, and discussion topics that the NA Fellowship worldwide is being asked to consider and form a group conscience on.

The CAR serves as the foundation for Fellowship-wide participation in NA World Services decisions. It includes:

  • Motions from the World Board and regions/zones for Fellowship decision
  • The CAR Survey (ideas for recovery literature, service material, and Issue Discussion Topics)
  • Discussion questions on important Fellowship topics
  • Reports and context for the issues being addressed

The 2026 CAR is particularly significant as it represents the culmination of a collaborative three-year conference cycle and includes the first-ever Fellowship-approved NAWS Strategic Plan created collectively by conference participants.

Important: The CAR is available at no cost at na.org/conference in English and multiple translations. Every member is encouraged to read it and provide input.
2 What's different about the 2026 CAR compared to previous years?

The 2026 CAR marks several important changes that reflect the Fellowship's evolution toward a more discussion-focused, collaborative approach:

Discussion-Focused Approach:

This CAR contains only 5 motions (3 from the World Board, 2 from regions), compared to past CARs that were often filled with numerous motions. The focus has shifted toward discussion and consensus-building rather than motion-driven decision-making. This allows for more meaningful dialogue and deeper exploration of complex issues.

Collaborative Strategic Planning:

For the first time, the Fellowship is being asked to adopt a Strategic Plan (2026–2029) that was created collaboratively by all conference participants over the course of the cycle, rather than just being presented by the World Board. This represents an unprecedented level of Fellowship involvement in planning World Services' work.

Revised CAR Survey Process:

Instead of submitting motions for specific project plans, conference participants submitted ideas for possible inclusion in the 2026 CAR survey. The survey was created collectively by conference participants working together, ensuring broader representation of Fellowship priorities.

Discussion Questions:

The CAR includes in-depth discussion questions on two major topics (Gender-Neutral and Inclusive Language, and DRT/MAT in NA) with input requested from any interested member by April 1, 2026. These aren't yes/no questions but opportunities for sharing experience, strength, and hope.

Why These Changes?

As the 2006 CAR noted (and we've been working toward since), "The Conference is a vehicle for fellowship communication and unity: a forum where our common welfare is itself the business of the meeting." These changes help us have more meaningful conversations and make better collective decisions.

3 What are the critical deadlines for the 2026 CAR process?
Deadline What's Due Who
February 28, 2026 Regional and zonal reports Regions/Zones
March 3, 2026 Amendments to CAR/CAT motions and seating motions Conference Participants
March 4, 2026 Conference registration, hotel, and funding requests Conference Participants
March 2026 Finalize flight arrangements (funded participants) Conference Participants
April 1, 2026 CAR Survey responses (members and regions/zones) All Members, Regions/Zones
April 1, 2026 Discussion questions input All Members, Regions/Zones
Before April 18, 2026 Collect regional/zonal conscience on motions Conference Participants
April 18, 2026 WSC Orientation (virtual) Conference Participants
After April 18, 2026 Initial Straw Poll ePoll (72-hour window) Conference Participants
May 3–9, 2026 WSC 2026 Conference Participants
Important Note: The initial straw poll is more important than ever because it will be a decision if any items have consensus (80%+ in support or not in support). Plan to have your regional/zonal conscience collected before April 18.

All deadlines are also posted at na.org/dates

4 How does the new CAR Survey process work, and what am I being asked to prioritize?

The 2026 CAR Survey represents a new collaborative approach to identifying Fellowship priorities:

How Ideas Were Collected:

  • Conference participants (regions, zones, and the World Board) submitted ideas for recovery literature, service material, and Issue Discussion Topics
  • Ideas from the 2023 CAR survey were made available for reintroduction if participants wished
  • Any member or service body could submit ideas before the deadline
  • Ideas emerging from planning discussions at the Interim WSC were also added

How the Survey Was Created:

  1. All ideas were compiled into lists
  2. Conference participants prioritized them via ballot
  3. The results were distributed to conference participants
  4. Conference participants worked together to condense the lists to manageable sizes, combining similar ideas
  5. The conference collectively created the final lists for the CAR survey

What You're Being Asked:

The survey asks you to prioritize ideas in three categories:

  • Recovery Literature projects - New books, booklets, or pamphlets
  • Service Material projects - Handbooks, guides, and service tools
  • Issue Discussion Topics - Important Fellowship-wide conversations

Important Survey Notes:

  • The online version is randomized (choices appear in different orders each time)
  • Ideas are numbered to make tracking priorities easier
  • Each idea includes an objective number showing its connection to the Strategic Plan
  • Results will help shape the focus of project plans for recovery literature, service material, and IDTs

How to Complete the Survey:

  • As an individual: Go to na.org/survey
  • As a region/zone: Your delegate will coordinate collecting your service body's conscience and submitting one response representing your community
  • Deadline: April 1, 2026 for both individual and regional/zonal responses

Both sets of results (individual members and regions/zones) are reported side by side to conference participants and included in the WSC minutes appendices.

5 What motions are included in the 2026 CAR?

There are five motions in the 2026 CAR:

World Board Motions

Motion 1: Approve the revised IP #21, Staying Clean in Isolation

Replaces: The Loner—Staying Clean in Isolation

Intent: To update this IP (originally approved in 1986) with current Fellowship experience

Key Changes:

  • Removes the stigmatizing term "loner" from the title
  • Reflects changes in how members experience isolation (geographic, illness, caregiving, aging, etc.)
  • Includes modern resources like virtual meetings and online support
  • Incorporates experience from members who stayed clean in isolation during the 2020-2023 shutdown
  • Provides updated guidance available at na.org

Financial Impact: None at this time

Motion 2: Adopt the collaboratively created 2026–2029 NA World Services Strategic Plan

Intent: To approve the results of the collaborative planning that began at WSC 2023 and continued with zonal and conference participant involvement throughout this cycle

Significance:

  • First time the Fellowship is being asked to adopt a Strategic Plan created collectively by conference participants
  • Represents 2.5+ years of collaborative work
  • Involved input from every zone in the world
  • Uses the word "adopt" rather than "approve" because the plan was co-created by delegates on behalf of the Fellowship

What's in the Plan:

  • Key Result Areas (the four pillars we build around)
  • Issues (factors identified as most important to address)
  • Objectives (goals to achieve by end of cycle)
  • Solutions (paths to achieving objectives)

Financial Impact: No direct financial impact. Future expenses will be in project plans or budgets

Motion 3: Hold WCNA every 5 years beginning in 2028, with location determined by the World Board

Intent: To have WCNA guidelines that reflect the changing nature of large events worldwide and support prudent use of Fellowship resources

Key Changes from Current Policy:

  • Frequency: Every 5 years instead of every 3 years (allows more planning time and makes events more special)
  • Schedule: Will align with milestone NA anniversaries (2028 = NA's 75th anniversary!)
  • Location: Decided by World Board based on fiscal and geographic considerations rather than fixed rotation plan
  • Goal: Each WCNA to be at minimum revenue-neutral
  • Planning: May include capped attendance for prudent facility use

Why This Change:

  • WCNA 38 in Washington, DC, faced significant shortfall ($956,129)
  • Event costs, especially audio/video production, continue to rise dramatically
  • Fellowship behavior has changed post-pandemic (virtual attendance, more local events)
  • Global circumstances are too unpredictable to plan locations far in advance
  • World Services remains committed to WORLD convention with rotation to extent prudent and possible

Next Convention: Intended for Europe in 2028 (location being finalized)

Financial Impact: No direct impact. Future WCNA budgets will be presented separately

Regional Motions

Regional Motion from Arizona: Regarding literature on tablets for incarcerated members

(Specific details are in the CAR document)

Regional Motion from South Florida: Calling for AI to replace human interpreters at conference and conference participant web meetings

(Specific details are in the CAR document)

How Motions Are Decided:

All decisions at WSC require a two-thirds (2/3) majority to pass, except elections. The conference uses a consensus-based process where:

  • Consensus support = 80% or more in favor
  • Consensus not in support = 20% or fewer in favor
  • If initial straw poll shows consensus, it becomes a decision automatically
  • If no consensus, discussion follows using the tools described in FAQ #11
6 What is the NAWS Strategic Plan, and how was I involved in creating it?

The NAWS Strategic Plan guides NA World Services' change initiatives and new projects (distinct from ongoing work like correspondence, translations, and shipping). For the first time, this plan was created collaboratively by the entire conference over 2.5 years.

The Collaborative Process

  1. WSC 2023: Conference participants began an inventory of factors (inside and outside NA) affecting our ability to carry the message
  2. After WSC 2023: CPs prioritized factors via survey
  3. February–May 2024: Every zone met to discuss challenges and possible solutions
  4. June 2024: World Board drafted objectives based on all discussion notes
  5. Interim WSC 2025: CPs discussed issues and objectives
  6. July 2025: World Board revised objectives and drafted solutions
  7. August 2025: CPs discussed solutions at web meeting
  8. September 2025: World Board revised solutions and finalized draft

What's in the Plan

The plan contains four main components:

Key Result Areas: The four pillars we build the plan around (these change very little, if at all, from cycle to cycle)

Issues: Factors conference participants decided are most important to address this cycle. These represent challenges both inside and outside NA that affect our ability to carry the message.

Objectives: Goals to achieve by the end of the planning cycle. They express what we want to achieve (not how we'll achieve it). Objectives help us develop solutions that make sense in current circumstances.

Solutions: Paths to achieving objectives—the work World Services will undertake. Solutions don't include everything that might make progress on an objective, just the steps we want to take in the cycle ahead.

How Solutions Become Work:

The details of solutions—deliverables, timelines, media, etc.—are contained in project plans that appear in the Conference Approval Track (CAT) material. Sometimes the details are in charge forms that the World Board uses to give instructions to staff and volunteers.

For general projects (recovery literature, service material, IDTs), the CAR Survey helps determine the specific focus of the project at the WSC.

Scope of the Plan

The plan covers only the cycle ahead (2026–2029). The solutions represent what we believe we can focus on now—often first steps rather than complete solutions to large issues.

There is always much more included in the plan than can be accomplished in a given cycle. World Services works on what has been prioritized first and communicates with conference participants about progress throughout the cycle.

Some issues and objectives carry forward from cycle to cycle with slight revisions as we make incremental progress on large goals.

The Three-Year Cycle Connection:

The collaborative planning process depends on the three-year conference cycle (approved as a two-cycle trial, 2023–2029). In a body so large, international, and multilingual, we don't have time for this much conversation, revision, and review—this much back-and-forth—if we don't have at least three years.

The 2029 WSC will decide whether to continue the three-year cycle permanently. If not approved, the planning process will need to be reconsidered.

Your Ongoing Role

At WSC 2026, delegates will start the planning process for 2029–2032 by discussing factors in NA and the world that may most affect NA in the years ahead. The cycle of planning continues!

Throughout the cycle, regions and zones are essential collaborators. Without your work on projects, we won't be successful. World Services will be asking zonal and regional bodies to:

  • Hold workshops
  • Collect best practices
  • Review drafts
  • Provide feedback
  • Test new approaches

Making progress on most solutions in the plan depends upon collaboration from zones and regions.

7 What are the two main discussion topics in the CAR, and how can I participate?

The 2026 CAR includes two major discussion topics with questions for Fellowship input. These are NOT motions or yes/no questions—they're opportunities for sharing experience, strength, and hope to help build consensus on complex issues.

Topic 1: Gender-Neutral and Inclusive Language

What This Is About:

This focuses specifically on changes to language that describes people (members and potential members)—NOT language describing a Higher Power or the wording of Steps and Traditions (those are for future discussion).

Examples of Changes Being Considered:

  • Changing "men and women" to "people"
  • Changing "a man or woman" to "a person"
  • Similar to changes already made in newer literature like Living Clean (2012)

Why This Matters:

  • Some addicts tell us they don't feel included by gendered language in our literature
  • 83% of Membership Survey respondents said identification was key to staying in NA
  • We can't hear from addicts who went to their first meeting, felt they didn't belong, and never came back
  • NA has revised language before for this exact reason—to expand who feels welcome (example: changing "fix, pill, or drink" to "drug" in 1986)

Survey Results So Far:

  • Over 5,500 NA members responded to the IDT survey this cycle
  • 50% support changes to gender-inclusive language
  • 45% do not support changes
  • Setting aside Russian responses (where gender/identity issues are complicated by current laws): 62% support, 32% against

The Key Question:

"Given that we all want to provide a safe, welcoming, inclusive Fellowship where everyone can recover (regardless of...), are we willing to explore these types of changes in our literature in order to carry the message more effectively? If not, why not?"

Project Plan: The World Board will offer a project plan in the CAT material (February 2026) to investigate changes, as directed by WSC 2023 Motion 14.

Topic 2: DRT/MAT in NA—Helping Members Take Root

What This Is About:

How NA can help addicts who come to meetings while on medication for addiction treatment (DRT/MAT) decide to become members and find a new way of life.

The Challenge:

  • We have consensus on the front door (Third Tradition: anyone is welcome)
  • We do NOT have consensus on whether someone taking medication to treat addiction is "clean"
  • This lack of consensus has been ongoing for 20+ years
  • Many members hold strong positions on both sides
  • Questions arise around service and celebration for members on medication

Why This Is Urgent:

  • NA growth in the US is flat or declining
  • Treatment programs increasingly use medication-based approaches
  • Professionals at WCNA 38 PR sessions said they hesitate to refer addicts to NA because of hostile atmosphere for those on medication
  • Some members report being advised not to share about prescribed (sometimes mandated) medications
  • 82% of members say they stay because of identification and welcome they felt

What We're Being Asked:

Not to resolve the question of "clean" or "abstinent" (we don't have consensus and may never have it), but rather:

  • How can we help addicts coming in the door to stay long enough to want what we have?
  • How can we make NA welcoming without compromising our integrity or message?
  • Can we find spiritual principles that allow us to live and recover together despite differences?
Important Context: Over 850 responses to the IDT survey showed plentiful and emotional input. Many responses reflected deep pain and urgency from disparate positions. It feels like an issue of survival—both for the addict suffering and for the Fellowship itself. What we need most is to create an atmosphere of recovery around the issue, beginning from our spiritual principles.

How to Participate

For Any Interested Member:

  • Questions will be posted at na.org/surveys
  • Share your experience, strength, and hope
  • Deadline: April 1, 2026

For Regions and Zones:

  • Hold CAR workshops to discuss these questions
  • Submit collective input from your service body
  • Complete discussions by April 1 to allow results to be compiled

What Happens Next:

  • Responses compiled and distributed to conference participants before WSC 2026
  • Results will inform discussions at WSC 2026
  • Conference participants will have sessions dedicated to these topics
  • Input helps move the conversation forward

Listening with Love:

On these highly charged issues, can we agree to listen to one another with love, compassion, and a willingness to respect our opposing viewpoints? In this polarized world, creating an atmosphere of recovery around difficult issues may be one of our most important spiritual practices.

8 How does the CAR process fit into the overall World Service Conference cycle?

The CAR is one part of a comprehensive conference cycle that brings together the Fellowship worldwide to plan, discuss, and decide on World Services work.

Pre-Conference Publications

1. Conference Agenda Report (CAR)

  • Published: November 3, 2025 (English); December 3, 2025 (translations)
  • Contains: Motions and discussion topics for Fellowship consideration
  • Purpose: Fellowship-wide group conscience formation
  • Timeline: Minimum 180 days before conference (150 for translations)

2. Conference Approval Track (CAT)

  • Published: February 3, 2026
  • Contains: Budget, project plans, and other material for conference participants
  • Purpose: Decisions on operational matters and service initiatives
  • Timeline: 90 days before conference

3. Conference Report

  • Published: Shortly before WSC 2026
  • Contains: Logistics, schedule, summary information from surveys
  • Purpose: Final preparation for conference participants

The Three-Year Conference Cycle (2023–2026)

Event Date Purpose
WSC 2023 April 30 – May 6, 2023 Full conference, began strategic planning process
Regular CP Web Meetings Every other month Ongoing communication and discussion
Zonal Forum Meetings Throughout cycle Strategic planning discussions, regional collaboration
Interim WSC 2025 February 28 – March 1, 2025 Virtual meeting for essential decisions, planning discussions
CAR Publication November 2025 Fellowship consideration of motions and discussions
CAT Publication February 2026 Conference participant review of budget and project plans
WSC 2026 May 3–9, 2026 Full conference in Woodland Hills, California

How the CAR Fits In

Before the CAR:

  • Work approved at previous conference is completed by World Services
  • Strategic planning process involves all conference participants
  • Communication throughout cycle via reports, surveys, web meetings
  • Ideas collected for CAR Survey collaboratively

During the CAR Process:

  • Fellowship reads and discusses CAR motions
  • Members complete CAR Survey and discussion questions
  • Regions/zones collect group conscience
  • CAR workshops held worldwide
  • Delegates prepare to represent Fellowship at WSC

At the Conference:

  • CAR-related discussions and decisions occur early in the week
  • Discussion questions inform conference sessions
  • CAR Survey results guide project priorities
  • Motions decided by consensus-based process
  • Approved work becomes foundation for next cycle

After the CAR:

  • Input compiled and shared with conference participants
  • Initial straw poll on motions (consensus becomes decision)
  • Conference discussions informed by Fellowship input
  • Approved work shapes next three years
  • Planning begins for 2029–2032 cycle

Continuous Cycle:

The conference is not just an event—it's an ongoing, participatory service body that meets, creates, and makes decisions throughout the conference cycle. The CAR represents the culmination of work from the previous cycle AND the beginning of work for the cycle ahead.

Other Important Conference Publications

  • NAWS News: Short, easily translatable reports published several times per year after World Board meetings
  • NA World Services Annual Report: Summary of activity and audited financial statement for the prior fiscal year
  • Regional and Zonal Reports: Posted with Conference Report, historical record of NA service worldwide

All conference publications and materials are posted at na.org/conference

9 What should regions and local service bodies be doing with the CAR?

Immediate Actions (Now through March 2026)

1. Hold CAR Workshops

CAR workshops are your primary vehicle for Fellowship participation. Schedule workshops to:

  • Review the five motions - Discuss each motion, its intent, and implications
  • Develop regional/zonal conscience - Collect input from groups and areas
  • Complete the CAR Survey - As a region or zone, prioritize items
  • Discuss the two major topics - Gender-neutral language and DRT/MAT
  • Educate members - About the Strategic Plan and collaborative planning process
  • Answer questions - Help members understand the issues and processes
Critical Timeline: Complete CAR workshops and collect your regional/zonal conscience BEFORE April 18, 2026. The initial straw poll happens after that date, and if motions have consensus (80%+), they become decisions without further discussion.

2. Engage Members

Encourage all members to:

  • Read the CAR (available free at na.org/conference)
  • Complete the individual CAR Survey at na.org/survey
  • Respond to discussion questions at na.org/surveys
  • Attend CAR workshops
  • Share their thoughts with their group's GSR
  • Deadline: April 1, 2026 for surveys and discussion input

3. Communicate with Your Delegate

  • Share your group's thoughts and concerns
  • Provide input to help your delegate represent your region/zone
  • Remember: Delegates represent the best interests of NA as a whole, not solely their community's priorities
  • Stay connected throughout the cycle via regional assemblies and reports

Resources Available to Help

From NA World Services:

  • PowerPoints summarizing CAR material (posted at na.org/conference)
  • Videos explaining key issues
  • Glossary of terms in the CAR
  • Planning information at na.org/planning
  • CAR workshop schedules (if World Board is facilitating in your area)

For Conference Participants:

  • Conference Participant Discussion Board
  • Regular web meetings (every other month)
  • Direct contact with World Board at [email protected]
  • "Delegate Preparation" section in the CAR

Workshop Planning Tips

Format Suggestions:

  • Hold multiple workshops if needed to cover all material
  • Consider separate sessions for motions, survey, and discussion topics
  • Use small group discussions to engage more members
  • Allow time for questions and clarification
  • Make materials available in multiple formats (print, digital, audio)

What to Cover:

  • Overview of what the CAR is and why it matters
  • Explanation of each motion with context
  • Review of Strategic Plan and collaborative planning process
  • Discussion of gender-neutral language and DRT/MAT topics
  • How to complete the CAR Survey
  • Timeline and deadlines
  • How members can provide input

Key Deadlines for Service Bodies

Deadline What's Due
February 28, 2026 Regional reports and material for Conference Report
April 1, 2026 Regional/zonal CAR Survey responses and discussion input
Before April 18, 2026 Regional/zonal conscience collected on all motions

For Conference Participants Specifically

If you are a regional or zonal delegate or alternate, in addition to the above:

  • Review carefully: The "Delegate Preparation" section of the CAR
  • Register ASAP: Complete conference registration (deadline March 4, 2026)
  • Book flights: By March 2026 if you're a funded participant
  • Participate: In conference participant web meetings throughout the cycle
  • Attend orientations: Virtual WSC orientation on April 18, 2026
  • Be prepared: For initial straw poll after April 18
  • Submit reports: Regional/zonal report by February 28

Remember: The effectiveness of the conference depends on the preparation of all conference participants. The amount of information is substantial, so start early and reach out for help when needed. You can always email the World Board at [email protected] with questions.

10 What happens after I participate in the CAR process?

Short Term (Before WSC 2026)

After April 1, 2026:

  • CAR Survey results compiled - Individual member and regional/zonal responses tabulated
  • Discussion responses compiled - Input on gender-neutral language and DRT/MAT organized
  • Results distributed - All results shared with conference participants
  • Conference preparation - Results help shape conference discussions and decisions

After April 18, 2026:

  • Initial straw poll conducted - Conference participants have 72 hours to respond
  • Automatic decisions - If motions have consensus (80%+ in support or not in support), they become decisions
  • Discussion items identified - Motions without consensus will be discussed at WSC 2026

At WSC 2026 (May 3–9)

Conference Week Activities:

  • Welcome and Orientation - Newly seated regions introduced, conference overview
  • CAR-Related Discussions and Decisions - Occurs early in the week for motions without consensus
  • Discussion Sessions - Gender-neutral language and DRT/MAT discussions informed by Fellowship input
  • Strategic Planning - Begin framing issues for 2029–2032 plan, evaluate current planning process
  • CAT-Related Decisions - Budget, project plans, and other operational matters
  • Project Priorities Set - Based on CAR Survey results
  • Elections - World Board, Human Resource Panel, and WSC Cofacilitators
  • Reports - World Services and Human Resource Panel present activities
  • New Idea Discussions - Participants submit and discuss new proposals
  • Wrap-up - Review work ahead and final decisions

Long Term (After WSC 2026)

Approved Motions Implemented:

  • IP #21 changes - If approved, revised pamphlet published and distributed
  • Strategic Plan - If adopted, guides World Services work for 2026–2029
  • WCNA changes - If approved, affects future World Convention planning
  • Regional motions - If approved, implemented as specified

Project Work Begins:

  • CAR Survey results guide projects - Recovery literature, service material, and IDT priorities identified
  • Project plans implemented - Work approved in CAT material begins
  • Fellowship Development - Support for new and growing communities continues
  • Public Relations - PR initiatives and professional outreach expands
  • Translations - Literature translation and distribution work continues
  • Technology - Website improvements, virtual meeting support, digital resources

Conference Cycle Continues:

  • Regular web meetings - Conference participants meet every two months
  • Planning for 2029–2032 - Strategic planning process begins for next cycle
  • NAWS News published - Regular updates on World Services activities
  • Zonal forum meetings - Regional collaboration and Fellowship development
  • Continuous communication - Reports, surveys, and feedback opportunities
  • CAT material prepared - For any interim meeting if needed

Fellowship Involvement Opportunities:

  • Focus groups formed - Virtual meetings to work on specific projects
  • Regional/zonal participation - Asked to hold workshops, review drafts, provide feedback
  • Surveys distributed - Input requested on various project topics
  • Testing new approaches - Regions and zones pilot new service materials or methods
  • Best practices collection - Sharing what works in different communities

Reporting and Accountability

Conference Report Published:

  • Complete record of WSC 2026 decisions
  • Posted at na.org/conference
  • Minutes distributed to conference participants within 90 days
  • Includes appendices with survey results

NAWS News:

  • Published several times per year after World Board meetings
  • Short, easily translatable reports on current activities
  • Distributed to areas, regions, and conference participants
  • Available in multiple languages

Annual Report:

  • Summary of World Services activity for the fiscal year
  • Audited financial statement
  • All contributions received listed
  • Released around end of calendar year
  • Posted at na.org/ar

Project Progress Updates:

  • Regular updates in NAWS News
  • Shared at conference participant web meetings
  • Posted on conference webpage
  • Opportunities for ongoing input

The Cycle Completes and Begins Again

The CAR process is not a one-time event but the beginning of three years of collaborative work to carry the message to addicts everywhere. Each cycle builds on the last, and your participation helps shape NA's future.

Your Continued Involvement Matters:

Throughout the 2026–2029 cycle, there will be many opportunities to stay involved:

  • Respond to surveys on specific projects
  • Participate in focus groups
  • Review drafts of new materials
  • Share best practices from your community
  • Provide feedback on initiatives
  • Support your delegate in their ongoing work

The more engaged we all are, the better World Services can support the Fellowship in carrying our message of recovery.

11 How does consensus-based decision making work at the WSC?

The World Service Conference uses a consensus-based decision-making (CBDM) process rather than strict parliamentary procedure. This approach is designed to ensure all voices are heard and to create decisions that serve the worldwide Fellowship.

What Is Consensus-Based Decision Making?

Consensus refers to the consent of the group—the willingness to move forward with a decision on the part of all members, rather than just a majority. However, WSC uses a form of CBDM that doesn't require unanimous agreement.

From A Guide to World Services in NA:

"Consensus is based on the belief that each person has some part of the truth and no one person has all of it (no matter how tempting it is to believe that we ourselves really know best!). The consensus process is what a group goes through to reach an agreement. It is how we manifest the idea 'together we can do what we cannot do alone' in a service setting."

How Consensus Is Measured at WSC

Consensus is measured by straw polls and votes:

  • Consensus support: 80% or more in favor
  • Consensus not in support: 80% or more not in favor (20% or fewer in favor)
  • Strong support: Two-thirds majority (66.66% to less than 80%)
  • Lack of strong support: More than 20% but less than two-thirds
New for 2026: If a motion has consensus in an initial straw poll (held after April 18, 2026), the Cofacilitators will announce the results as a final decision. This means if 80%+ support or 80%+ do not support, it becomes a decision without further discussion.

The CBDM Process at WSC

Step 1: Initial Straw Poll

  • Conducted via ePoll before the in-person meeting
  • Conference participants have 72 hours to respond
  • Measures initial level of support for each motion
  • If consensus exists, it becomes a decision
  • If no consensus, motion proceeds to discussion

Step 2: Amendments (if applicable)

  • Before discussing a motion, any amendments are considered
  • Amendments must be submitted 60 days before WSC (45 days before Interim)
  • WSC Cofacilitators ensure amendments are clear and ready for yes/no vote
  • If amendments pass, motion is read as amended and straw polled again

Step 3: Discussion (if needed)

  • Facilitator manages discussion using various tools
  • Participants added to discussion pool, facilitator creates queue
  • Each speaker has maximum 2 minutes (additional time may be allowed for translations)
  • Intermediate straw polls may be conducted to measure change in support
  • Facilitator may declare discussion will end after specific speaker or close discussion queue

Step 4: Decision

  • All decisions require two-thirds (2/3) majority to pass
  • Includes changes to motions, procedural decisions, and requests for roll call vote
  • Exception: Elections require different thresholds (60% for World Board, 50% for HRP and Cofacilitators)

Tools for Managing Discussions

The WSC Cofacilitators have several tools:

  • Discussion pool: Unordered list of participants wishing to speak
  • Discussion queue: Ordered list developed from the pool
  • Intermediate straw polls: Measure change in support during discussion
  • Time limits: 2 minutes per speaker (may be extended)
  • Closing discussion: Facilitator may close queue or declare end after specific speaker
  • Appeals process: Participants can appeal facilitator decisions (requires 50%+1 to uphold)

Why Consensus-Based Decision Making?

Benefits of CBDM:

  • Higher-quality decisions: Multiple perspectives lead to better outcomes
  • Greater acceptance: Participants more likely to implement decisions they helped shape
  • Respects all viewpoints: Every voice matters, even minority opinions
  • Builds unity: Focus on common welfare rather than winners/losers
  • Encourages creativity: Discussion can transform proposals into something better
  • Spiritual process: Invites Higher Power influence through collective wisdom

Challenges of CBDM:

  • Time-consuming: More discussion means longer meetings
  • Requires commitment: All participants must focus on common ground
  • Needs skilled facilitation: Cofacilitators must guide discussion effectively
  • Preparation essential: Participants must arrive informed

Straw Poll Terminology

When Cofacilitators announce straw poll results, they use specific terms:

Term Percentage Meaning
Unanimous support 100% Everyone in favor
Consensus support 80–99% Overwhelming support
Strong support 66.66–79% Two-thirds majority
Lack of strong support 21–66% Less than two-thirds
Consensus not in support 1–20% Overwhelming opposition
No support 0% No one in favor

Remember: A motion must have at least "strong support" (two-thirds) to pass.

The Spiritual Foundation

Our Ninth Concept: "All elements of our service structure have the responsibility to carefully consider all viewpoints in their decision-making processes."

The commitment to consensus-based decision making is part of the spiritual means by which we invite a loving God to influence our decisions. It requires:

  • Humility: Recognizing we don't have all the answers
  • Trust: In the process and each other
  • Patience: Allowing time for discussion
  • Open-mindedness: Willingness to be changed by what we hear
  • Focus on common welfare: What serves NA as a whole

Throughout the week, each participant is challenged to really listen to what is being said, to consider with an open mind what will best serve the Fellowship worldwide, and often to surrender to what seems to serve the greater good. With over 100 participants, respect, patience, and trust are required.

12 Why is NA World Services raising literature prices, and what can I do to help?

On January 1, 2026, NA World Services implemented a 15% uniform increase in the price of literature. This decision was driven by rising costs and the need to maintain services to the Fellowship. Understanding the reasons behind this increase—and the alternatives to raising prices—is important for all NA members.

The Financial Reality

Rising Costs:

  • Overall expenses rose $1,261,703 (15%) from 2004 to 2024
  • Basic Text income increased only $33,444 (1.13%) in the same period
  • Income from IPs and booklets fell 17.83% over 20 years
  • Without price increase: estimated reduction of $671,000 annually in net income
  • Costs continue rising: printing, production, warehousing, logistics, operations

Services Provided:

World Services provides substantial free and subsidized literature:

  • Fiscal Year 2024: $769,958 in free/subsidized literature
  • 5-year average: $635,639 annually
  • 10-year average: $607,864 annually
  • Trend: Over $700,000 per year for the past three years
  • Includes direct costs for shipping, customs, and duties

Digital Resources (No Cost to Fellowship):

  • All IPs and booklets posted free in 60+ languages at na.org/literature
  • Audio recordings of Basic Text in 12 languages at na.org/audio
  • Materials on inmate tablets (1+ million incarcerated addicts)
  • Electronic literature (elit) versions
  • These represent over $1 million less in annual revenue

Why Literature Sales Matter

The Fellowship's Growth Challenge:

  • Growth in the US is stagnant or declining
  • Literature sales have remained steady, not growing
  • Most literature is purchased for newcomers
  • Virtual NA reduces physical literature distribution
  • Longtime members often already have books
  • Free digital access reduces potential sales

The Basic Text:

  • 39% of total books distributed (401,464 copies in FY2024)
  • 51% of all books sold since 1983 (13,405,012 copies)
  • Lion's share of World Services income
  • Initial price in 1983: $8.00 (equivalent to $26.29 today)
  • Current price: $15.65 (already inexpensive compared to inflation)

The Original Model:

When the Basic Text was released in April 1983, the price was set at over twice the cost. Half was used for producing more books, and half for funding Fellowship support services. This model has sustained World Services for over 40 years.

Why Not Just Cut Services?

World Services has already done remarkable work maintaining services with minimal staff increases despite massive Fellowship growth:

Year Staff Meetings Books Languages Ratio
1987 38 11,082 1 4 1:292
2025 37 72,215 7 58 1:1,952

Ratio = Staff per meeting

World Services truly does "more with less" and has maintained this ability despite inevitable cost increases.

The Real Solution: Direct Contributions

For decades, World Services has communicated that relying on literature sales to fund services is not sustainable. Reports from 1987, 1990, and 1997 all identified the same issue we face today.

From 1990 WSO Office Manager:

"There are three solutions: cut WSO activity, increase prices, or receive direct contributions from members, groups, areas, and regions. I do not know what solution you will select, but failure to increase the funds available to meet the needs of addicts around the world dooms them to an early death. N.A. is the only antidote, and only you the member have the key to its use."

Progress Made:

  • FY2024 and FY2025: Just over $2 million in contributions (2nd and 3rd time ever)
  • Without these contributions, price increases would have come sooner and been larger
  • Current monthly recurring contributors: Just under 1,000
  • Average monthly contribution: Just over $28.00

What's Needed:

  • Goal: Increase monthly recurring contributions to 3,000
  • For complete self-support: Would take 20,000+ members at current average
  • Reality: We need a Fellowship-wide shift in thinking about fund flow

What You Can Do

As an Individual Member:

  • Set up monthly recurring contribution at na.org/contribute
  • Make one-time contributions when you can
  • Encourage your home group to contribute regularly
  • Share this information with other members

As a Group:

  • Include World Services in your group's fund flow
  • Consider monthly group contributions instead of sporadic giving
  • Educate group members about World Services needs
  • Remember that supporting World Services supports NA everywhere

As a Service Body:

  • Include World Services in regional/area budgets
  • Make regular contributions part of financial planning
  • Share World Services financial reports with your community
  • Help members understand the need

Our Common Welfare:

From It Works: How and Why, Tradition One: "One way to look at placing our common welfare first is to say that each of us is equally responsible for NA's well-being.... As each individual member relies on the support of the fellowship for survival, so NA's survival depends on its members."

It is time to start having conversations with each other, our groups, and our service bodies about the need for a shift in fund flow. For the betterment of the Fellowship, the efforts to fund services must be met with the same passion as the need for those services.

The Bottom Line

The 15% price increase helps maintain services but doesn't solve the underlying issue. The sustainable solution is for NA to shift from reliance on literature sales to direct contributions from members, groups, and service bodies. Every contribution makes a difference!

To contribute: Visit na.org/contribute

For more information: Read FIPT Bulletin #35 posted at na.org/fipt

13 What's changing with the World Convention, and why?

Motion 3 in the 2026 CAR proposes significant changes to how the World Convention of Narcotics Anonymous (WCNA) is planned and held. These changes reflect lessons learned from WCNA 38 and the changing landscape of large events worldwide.

Proposed Changes

Three Major Changes:

  1. Frequency: Every 5 years instead of every 3 years
  2. Scheduling: Aligned with NA milestone anniversaries (2028 = NA's 75th!)
  3. Location: Determined by World Board based on fiscal and geographic considerations rather than fixed rotation plan

Key Goal: Each WCNA to be at minimum revenue-neutral (income equals expenses)

History of WCNA Rotation

Early Years (1971–1996):

  • Annual events
  • Very California-centric
  • First convention outside California in late 1970s
  • First convention outside US: WCNA 16 in 1986

First Rotation Plan (1996):

  • Changed from annual to two-year schedule
  • Created "zonal" rotation plan (9 zones)
  • Goal: Move outside North America every other convention
  • Challenge: Most attendees from North America, making other locations less accessible
  • Modified to 6 zones with extra North American locations (1998–2009)

Current Plan (Since 2012):

  • Three-year schedule
  • Alternates between US and non-US locations
  • North America every 6 years, outside North America every 6 years

Impact of Pandemic:

  • WCNA 38 planned for Melbourne, Australia, in 2020
  • Postponed for one year due to COVID-19
  • Eventually canceled due to ongoing concerns
  • Moved to Washington, DC, for 2024
  • WSC 2023 suspended rotation policy after 2024 to allow evaluation

What Happened at WCNA 38

The Expectations:

  • WCNA 37 (Orlando, 2018): Over 21,000 attendance, substantial profit (over $1 million)
  • WCNA 35 (Philadelphia): Good attendance, modest profit
  • Six years since last WCNA
  • Washington, DC: Easy drive for many densely populated NA regions
  • Logical to plan for possibly higher attendance than Orlando

The Reality:

  • Planned for: 24,000 attendees
  • Actual attendance: Just over 18,000 registered
  • Financial outcome: Expenses exceeded income by $956,129
  • Virtual participation: 37,563 connections to 11 streamed meetings

Why the Difference?

  • Virtual NA: Members can experience diversity online any time, reducing need to travel
  • Free streaming: Main meetings available online at no cost
  • More events: Increase in other NA conventions and events
  • Economic factors: Financial strain in current economy
  • Health concerns: Lingering COVID-19 concerns, especially among aging members
  • Behavior changes: Post-pandemic shifts in how members participate

Important Context: We're not alone in facing these challenges. AA recently held their international convention with nearly half of anticipated attendance. Event attendance prediction has become increasingly difficult for all organizations.

Rising Costs

Event Industry Changes:

  • Overall event expenses continue to climb
  • Audio and video production costs rising dramatically
  • Complexity and cost of international travel increasing
  • Facility costs less predictable
  • Contract negotiations more challenging

Market Uncertainty:

  • Conference industry as a whole is changing
  • Member behavior continues to evolve
  • No way to predict landscape years in advance
  • Global political and economic climates increasingly volatile

Why These Changes Make Sense

Every 5 Years:

  • Makes convention a more special occurrence
  • Allows members more time to plan financially
  • Gives World Services more time for effective planning
  • Can align with milestone NA anniversaries
  • Reduces frequency of financial risk

Flexible Location:

  • World too unpredictable for long-term fixed planning
  • Allows response to current circumstances
  • Can consider geopolitical factors at time of planning
  • Permits rotation "to extent prudent and possible"
  • Regular CP web meetings allow delegate input on locations

Revenue-Neutral Goal:

  • Ensures prudent use of Fellowship resources
  • May require capped attendance for effective facility use
  • Protects reserves from being depleted by single event
  • Allows services to continue without disruption

Addressing Concerns

Concern: Capped attendance limits newcomers

Response:

  • Newcomer registrations always available
  • Meetings available in neighboring facilities without registration
  • WCNA Unity Day event could be free or low-cost
  • Streaming keeps content accessible

Concern: Loss of fixed rotation plan

Response:

  • World Services remains committed to WORLD convention
  • 2028 convention intended for Europe (location being finalized)
  • Rotation will continue to extent prudent and possible
  • Current circumstances make fixed long-term planning impractical
  • Conference participants involved in location decisions through regular web meetings

Site Selection Process

The proposed guidelines (Addendum C of CAR) include a detailed site selection process:

  • World Board considers fiscal and geographic factors
  • Dialogue with delegates through regular CP web meetings
  • Transparent communication throughout planning
  • Commitment to global participation
  • Focus on revenue-neutral events

Looking Forward

WCNA 2028:

  • Intended location: Europe (being finalized)
  • Date: 2028 (NA's 75th Anniversary!)
  • Budget: Will be presented separately when site is confirmed

What Doesn't Change:

  • WCNA remains a celebration of unity, diversity, and recovery
  • Commitment to prudent planning
  • Transparent communication with Fellowship
  • Global participation encouraged
  • World Services' dedication to making WCNA accessible

World Services is committed to many more World Conventions. The proposed changes aim to ensure WCNA can continue as a sustainable celebration of our worldwide Fellowship.

14 How can I participate virtually in the conference process?

The World Service Conference has become truly hybrid since 2020, with increasing opportunities for virtual participation. Whether you're a conference participant (delegate/alternate) or a member interested in staying informed, there are many ways to participate virtually.

Virtual Conference Participation

For Conference Participants (Delegates/Alternates):

Remote WSC Attendance:

  • Participants unable to attend in person may participate remotely
  • Remote participants have the same rights as in-person participants
  • Full voting rights maintained
  • Ability to make motions and proposals
  • Participate in all discussions and sessions

History of Virtual Participation:

  • 2018: One delegate and two alternates attended virtually
  • 2023: 14 delegates and 25 alternates attended virtually
  • 2026: Continuing to improve virtual experience

Conference Participant Web Meetings:

  • Held every other month throughout the cycle
  • Scheduled at 11 AM Pacific Time
  • All delegates and alternates invited
  • Opportunities for discussion and updates
  • Planning conversations
  • Project updates

Scheduled Dates for 2023–2026 Cycle:

  • 22 July 2023
  • 23 September 2023
  • 18 November 2023
  • 20 January 2024
  • 16 March 2024
  • 18 May 2024
  • 20 July 2024
  • 21 September 2024
  • 7 December 2024
  • 15 February 2025 (Interim WSC Orientation)
  • 26 April 2025
  • 21 June 2025
  • 16 August 2025
  • 18 October 2025
  • 13 December 2025
  • 21 February 2026
  • 18 April 2026 (WSC Orientation)

Interim WSC:

  • Virtual meeting held mid-cycle
  • 2025 Interim: February 28 – March 1
  • Addresses essential decisions and planning
  • All voting participants attend virtually

For All Members

CAR Process Participation:

Virtual CAR Workshops:

  • Many regions and zones offer virtual CAR workshops
  • Check with your region/zone for schedule
  • Some workshops recorded for those who can't attend live
  • World Board may facilitate virtual workshops (check na.org/conference)

Staying Informed:

  • Conference webpage: na.org/conference for all materials
  • NAWS News: Regular updates published several times per year
  • Annual Report: Posted at na.org/ar
  • Planning page: na.org/planning for strategic plan progress
  • Email updates: Subscribe to receive notifications

Virtual Tools and Resources

Online Materials:

  • PowerPoint presentations of CAR material
  • Videos explaining key issues
  • Glossary of terms
  • Past WSC minutes and reports
  • Strategic plan documentation

Electronic Publications:

  • All Conference publications posted as PDFs
  • Available in multiple languages
  • Free to download and share
  • No login required

Communication Channels:

  • For Conference Participants: CP Discussion Board, web meetings, direct email
  • For All Members: Email [email protected] with questions
  • Regional/Zonal Communication: Through your delegate

Focus Groups and Project Work

Virtual Focus Groups:

  • World Services uses virtual focus groups for project work
  • More flexible and inclusive than standing workgroups
  • Allows greater diversity of participation
  • Cheaper than travel-based meetings

How to Get Involved:

  • Complete volunteer form at na.org (when posted)
  • Express interest in specific topics
  • Watch for announcements in NAWS News
  • Participate when invited

Recent Focus Group Topics:

  • Website redesign
  • IP #21 revision
  • Virtual Service Basics
  • H&I Basics
  • And more...

Benefits of Virtual Participation

Increased Accessibility:

  • No travel costs
  • No time away from work or family
  • Accessible to those with physical limitations
  • Available regardless of geographic location

Greater Inclusion:

  • Broader diversity of voices
  • More members can participate
  • Instant language interpretation available
  • Recording options for those who can't attend live

Environmental and Financial Benefits:

  • Reduced carbon footprint
  • Lower costs for Fellowship
  • More frequent opportunities to meet
  • Sustainable long-term approach

Technical Requirements

Basic Needs:

  • Computer, tablet, or smartphone
  • Internet connection
  • Web browser or meeting app
  • Camera and microphone (for participation)

Support Available:

  • Technical assistance from World Services
  • Orientation sessions before major events
  • Written instructions provided
  • Help desk during virtual events

Future of Hybrid Conference

Continuous Improvement:

World Services continues to look for ways to improve the WSC experience for all delegates, whether attending in person or virtually. The goal is to ensure that all conference participants have equal opportunity to contribute, regardless of how they attend.

The technologies that allowed us to stay connected during crisis now offer opportunity to work together throughout the cycle in new ways. The conference is evolving into an ongoing, participatory service body that meets, creates, and makes decisions year-round.

Your Participation Matters:

Whether you're a conference participant or a member interested in staying informed, your virtual participation helps ensure that our common welfare is served and that decisions reflect the voice of NA worldwide.

15 What is the three-year conference cycle experiment, and will it continue?

In 2023, the World Service Conference made a significant decision to experiment with a three-year conference cycle instead of the two-year cycle that had been in place since 2000. This experiment was approved for two cycles (2023–2029), and in 2029 the conference will decide whether to adopt it permanently.

History of Conference Cycles

Time Period Cycle Length Reason for Change
1976–2000 Annual Initial structure
2000–2020 Two years Allow more time for project work
2020–2023 Disrupted by COVID-19 Global shutdown, interim meetings
2023–2029 Three years (trial) Enable collaborative planning
2029 forward TBD Decision at WSC 2029

Why Three Years?

The Case for a Longer Cycle:

  • Time for meaningful work: Projects can develop more fully
  • Reduced pressure: Less rush between conferences
  • Collaborative planning possible: Time for back-and-forth dialog
  • Better quality decisions: More discussion, less haste
  • Cost savings: Fewer in-person conferences
  • Delegate experience: Longer term allows deeper involvement

What Three Years Enables:

  • Collaborative strategic planning (not possible in two years)
  • Fellowship-wide input on multiple drafts
  • Zonal forum involvement in planning
  • Literature projects from start to finish
  • Service material development and testing
  • Issue Discussion Topics with sustained conversation

Critical Connection to Strategic Plan:

The collaborative planning process is contingent on a three-year cycle. In a body so large, international, and multilingual, there is not enough time for the amount of conversation, revision, and review—the back-and-forth—needed to create the Strategic Plan collaboratively if we don't have at least three years.

If the three-year cycle isn't approved in 2029, the collaborative planning process will need to be reconsidered.

The Current Experiment (2023–2029)

Two-Cycle Trial Structure:

  • First cycle: 2023–2026 (with Interim WSC 2025)
  • Second cycle: 2026–2029 (with Interim WSC 2027)
  • Decision point: WSC 2029

Key Components:

  • In-person conferences: Every three years (2023, 2026, 2029)
  • Interim virtual conferences: Mid-cycle (2025, 2027)
  • Regular CP web meetings: Every other month
  • Collaborative planning: Throughout the cycle
  • Continuous communication: Reports, surveys, updates

What's Different in Three Years?

Conference Process Changes:

  • More time between publishing CAR and conference (motions Nov, conference May)
  • Fewer motions, more discussion
  • Collaborative creation of Strategic Plan
  • Interactive CAR Survey process
  • Sustained conversations on complex issues

Project Development:

  • Year 1: Survey and input gathering
  • Year 2: Draft development and review
  • Year 3: Revision and approval
  • Allows for multiple rounds of Fellowship input

Delegate Experience:

  • Longer term allows for deeper understanding
  • More time to build relationships with other CPs
  • Experience full cycle of project development
  • Participate in planning for subsequent cycle

The Role of Interim Conferences

Interim WSC Purpose:

  • Address legally necessary decisions
  • Consider items conference participants choose to address
  • Virtual meeting format
  • All voting participants attend online
  • Typically shorter than in-person conference

What's Decided at Interim:

  • Essential operational decisions
  • Items requiring timely action
  • Planning discussions
  • Not recovery literature approval

2025 Interim WSC Example:

  • Dates: February 28 – March 1, 2025
  • Interim CAR/CAT published: November 28, 2024
  • Made decisions on conference processes
  • Continued strategic planning conversations
  • Addressed CAR Survey process for current cycle

Benefits Seen So Far

Positive Outcomes:

  • Collaborative Strategic Plan creation successful
  • More meaningful Fellowship participation
  • Projects have time to develop properly
  • Less rushed decision-making
  • Better quality discussions
  • Stronger relationships among conference participants
  • Cost savings on conference expenses

Challenges:

  • Longer wait for new delegates to attend first in-person WSC
  • Maintaining momentum between conferences
  • Keeping Fellowship engaged throughout cycle
  • Balancing virtual and in-person participation

What Happens in 2029?

The Decision:

At WSC 2029, conference participants will be asked whether to adopt the three-year cycle on an ongoing basis or return to a two-year cycle.

Factors to Consider:

  • Success of collaborative planning process
  • Quality of project outcomes
  • Fellowship engagement levels
  • Delegate satisfaction and experience
  • Financial implications
  • Effectiveness of interim conferences
  • Virtual participation experience

If Three-Year Cycle Continues:

  • Collaborative planning process continues
  • Current structure becomes permanent
  • Refinements based on experience
  • Ongoing evaluation and improvement

If Return to Two-Year Cycle:

  • Strategic planning process must be reconsidered
  • Back to more motion-driven conferences
  • Less time for Fellowship input cycles
  • More frequent in-person conferences

Connection to Current CAR

The 2026–2029 Strategic Plan assumes a three-year cycle. If the three-year cycle is not approved in 2029, the planning process for 2029–2032 will need to be completely reconsidered.

From the CAR:

"We will plan for three years, but if the three-year cycle isn't approved, we will have to go back to the drawing board. The collaborative planning process is contingent on a three-year cycle."

Your Role in This Experiment

Throughout the Current Cycle:

  • Participate in surveys and input opportunities
  • Attend CAR workshops and provide feedback
  • Share your experience with the three-year cycle
  • Support your delegate in their work
  • Stay engaged between conferences

Before WSC 2029:

  • Evaluate the effectiveness of the three-year cycle
  • Consider the pros and cons
  • Discuss with your region/zone
  • Help inform your delegate's position

The three-year conference cycle is an experiment in evolving our service structure to better serve our common welfare. Your participation and feedback throughout both cycles will help the 2029 conference make an informed decision about the future.

16 How do members and groups "vote" on the CAR? What is the group conscience process?

Individual NA members and groups don't actually "vote" in a formal sense on CAR motions. Instead, we participate in a group conscience process—a spiritual decision-making approach that seeks to discover our Higher Power's will for the group or service body as a whole.

How Individual Members Participate

As an Individual:

  • Read the CAR: Available free at na.org/conference
  • Attend CAR workshops: Held by your area, region, or zone
  • Participate in group discussions: Share your thoughts at your home group
  • Complete the CAR Survey: Individual responses at na.org/survey
  • Answer discussion questions: Share experience on gender-neutral language and DRT/MAT topics
  • Talk with your GSR: Share your perspective to help inform group conscience

Individual members do NOT vote directly on CAR motions. Instead, they participate in discussions that help their group form a group conscience.

The Group Conscience Process

What Is Group Conscience?

Group conscience is a spiritual process through which NA groups seek to discover the will of a loving Higher Power. It's not simply a majority vote or the loudest voice in the room—it's a collective spiritual decision reached through prayer, discussion, and seeking unity.

From Guiding Principles, Tradition Two:

"Group conscience is the collective conscience of the group membership as guided by a loving Higher Power. A decision is made based on as much input as possible, the spiritual principles embodied in the Twelve Traditions, and what is in the best interest of the group and NA as a whole—not simply a majority vote."

How a Group Forms Conscience on CAR Issues:

  1. Information sharing: GSR shares CAR information with the group (or distributes CAR copies)
  2. Discussion: Members share their thoughts, concerns, and understanding
  3. Prayer/meditation: The group may take a moment to seek Higher Power guidance
  4. Seeking unity: The group works toward a decision that serves NA as a whole
  5. Recording the conscience: The decision is documented by the GSR

Important Points:

  • Not all members need to agree—we seek consensus and unity, not unanimity
  • Minority opinions should be heard and considered
  • The focus is on principles and the good of NA, not personal preferences
  • Some groups may vote as a practical tool, but it's the conscience, not the count, that matters
  • Groups don't have to have an opinion on every motion—"no group conscience" is a valid response

When Does This Happen?

Typical Timeline for Group Participation:

  • November/December 2025: CAR published, groups begin receiving information
  • December 2025 - March 2026: Groups discuss CAR motions at business meetings
  • January - March 2026: CAR workshops held in areas and regions
  • By late March/early April 2026: Groups should have formed and shared conscience with GSR
Critical Timing: Groups need to form their conscience early enough for it to flow through areas to regions before the regional conscience is needed (before April 18, 2026, for the initial straw poll).

What If My Group Doesn't Participate?

It's okay if your group doesn't form a conscience on CAR issues. Not every group participates in every CAR process. However:

  • Participation ensures your group's voice is heard in the larger Fellowship
  • It's an opportunity for members to learn about NA service and world affairs
  • Group participation helps GSRs represent their groups at the area level
  • Informed groups make better local decisions too

If your group hasn't discussed the CAR:

  • You can still participate as an individual by completing the CAR Survey
  • You can attend area or regional CAR workshops
  • You can talk with your GSR or RCM about the issues
  • Consider bringing it up at your next group business meeting

Special Note About CAR Surveys

The CAR Survey is slightly different from motions:

  • Individual survey: Any member can complete at na.org/survey
  • Regional/zonal survey: Service bodies submit one collective response
  • Both are valuable: Results from both are reported to conference participants
  • Purpose: Help prioritize recovery literature, service material, and IDT projects

The survey is about priorities and preferences, not formal decisions. Both individual member input and collective service body input inform conference participants' decisions.

17 How does group conscience flow from my home group to the World Service Conference?

Group conscience flows through the NA service structure in a carefully designed system that ensures the voice of individual groups reaches the World Service Conference. This process is often called "fund flow" when talking about money, but it's really "conscience flow" for decisions.

The Flow of Conscience: Step by Step

Level 1: The NA Group

  • Who: Individual members of a home group
  • What happens: Group discusses CAR issues and forms group conscience
  • When: Typically at group business meetings (December 2025 - March 2026)
  • Who carries it forward: Group Service Representative (GSR)
  • Where it goes: To the Area Service Committee

Level 2: The Area Service Committee (ASC)

  • Who: GSRs from all groups in the area, plus area officers and subcommittee chairs
  • What happens: GSRs share their groups' consciences, area discusses and may form area conscience
  • When: Area service meetings (typically monthly, January - March 2026)
  • Who carries it forward: Regional Committee Member (RCM)
  • Where it goes: To the Regional Service Committee

Important: Not all areas form a unified area conscience on every issue. Sometimes the RCM simply carries forward the diversity of group consciences from their area. That's okay—regional delegates need to know about the range of perspectives, not just a single position.

Level 3: The Regional Service Committee (RSC)

  • Who: RCMs from all areas in the region, regional officers
  • What happens: RCMs share area consciences, region discusses and forms regional conscience
  • When: Regional service meetings and regional assemblies (January - early April 2026)
  • Who carries it forward: Regional Delegate (RD)
  • Where it goes: To the World Service Conference

Level 4: The Regional Assembly (when used)

  • Who: GSRs and RCMs (depending on regional guidelines)
  • What happens: Broader discussion of CAR issues with direct group participation
  • When: Special assemblies or regular regional meetings (varies by region)
  • Purpose: Final opportunity for groups to participate directly in forming regional conscience
  • Result: Regional delegate receives clear sense of regional conscience

Level 5: The World Service Conference

  • Who: Regional delegates, zonal delegates, World Board members
  • What happens: Delegates represent their regions' consciences in discussions and decisions
  • When: May 3-9, 2026
  • Important: Delegates don't just "vote" their region's position—they participate in consensus-based discussions considering the good of NA worldwide

Visual Flow Chart

Level Body Carrier Direction
1 NA Group GSR → Up
2 Area Service Committee RCM → Up
3 Regional Service Committee RD → Up
4 World Service Conference ← Decision Down
5 Back to Regions ← RD Report Down
6 Back to Areas ← RCM Report Down
7 Back to Groups ← GSR Report Down

Real-World Timeline Example

November 3, 2025: CAR published

  • Jane downloads the CAR and brings it to her home group

December 2025 - January 2026: Group business meeting

  • Jane's group discusses Motion 1 (IP #21)
  • Members share their thoughts
  • Group forms conscience to support the motion
  • Jane (GSR) records the group conscience

February 2026: Area service meeting

  • Jane shares her group's support for Motion 1
  • Other GSRs share their groups' consciences (some support, some oppose, some no conscience)
  • Area discusses and may or may not form unified area conscience
  • Bob (RCM) takes notes on all the group consciences

March 2026: Regional assembly or RSC meeting

  • Bob shares the diversity of opinions from his area
  • Other RCMs share from their areas
  • Region discusses and forms regional conscience
  • Sarah (Regional Delegate) now understands her region generally supports Motion 1, with some concerns about...

Before April 18, 2026: Regional conscience finalized

  • Sarah has clear understanding of regional conscience on all motions
  • She's ready for the initial straw poll

After April 18, 2026: Initial straw poll

  • Sarah participates in ePoll representing her region
  • If consensus exists (80%+), motion decided
  • If not, discussion continues at WSC

May 3-9, 2026: World Service Conference

  • Sarah participates in discussions, bringing her region's perspective
  • She also considers what's best for NA worldwide
  • Decisions made through consensus-based process

After WSC 2026: Information flows back down

  • Sarah reports WSC decisions back to region
  • Bob shares at area meeting
  • Jane reports to her home group
  • Members learn what was decided and why

Key Principles

The Upside-Down Triangle:

NA's service structure is often described as an upside-down triangle, with groups at the top and World Services at the bottom. Authority flows UP from the groups, while support and services flow DOWN from World Services. This ensures that:

  • Groups remain the ultimate authority (Concept Two)
  • Delegates serve the groups, not the other way around
  • Decisions serve the collective good of all NA groups
  • World Services exists to serve and support groups

Important Notes:

  • Two-way street: Information flows up (conscience) and down (reports, decisions)
  • Not a pure democracy: Delegates don't just tally votes—they participate in spiritual consensus-seeking
  • Respect for minority: Even groups with minority positions should be heard
  • No group left out: Every group has the opportunity to participate through their GSR
  • Flexibility: Regions structure this process differently based on their needs
18 When and how does my regional delegate need to receive group/area conscience to represent us at WSC?

Your regional delegate (RD) needs to receive regional conscience before key decision points in the CAR process. Understanding the timeline and mechanisms helps ensure your voice reaches the World Service Conference.

Critical Deadlines for Regional Delegates

Most Important Deadline: Before April 18, 2026

This is when regional conscience MUST be collected because:

  • WSC Orientation happens April 18, 2026
  • Initial straw poll occurs AFTER April 18 (conference participants have 72 hours to respond)
  • If motions have consensus (80%+ support or not support) in the initial straw poll, they become decisions immediately
  • Delegates need to know regional conscience to participate in this critical first decision point
Why This Matters: The initial straw poll is more important than ever. If any CAR motion has consensus (80%+) in the initial straw poll, the WSC Cofacilitators announce that result as a final decision—no further discussion needed. Your delegate needs regional conscience BEFORE this poll to represent you accurately.

Recommended Timeline Working Backward:

Date Event Why It Matters
After April 18 Initial Straw Poll (72-hour window) RD votes based on regional conscience
Before April 18 Regional conscience finalized RD must know regional position
Late March/Early April Final regional assembly or RSC meeting Region finalizes conscience on all motions
Mid-March Areas complete conscience collection RCMs need to report to region
Late February/Early March Groups finalize consciences GSRs need to report to areas
January-February CAR workshops held Groups educated, discussion happens
December-January Groups begin discussing CAR Initial conscience formation starts
November 3, 2025 CAR published Process officially begins

How Regional Conscience Is Collected

Regions use different methods to collect and form regional conscience. Common approaches include:

Method 1: Regional Assembly

  • Who attends: GSRs and/or RCMs (varies by region)
  • When held: Typically 4-6 weeks before WSC
  • Purpose: Direct group participation in forming regional conscience
  • Process: Groups/areas share consciences, region discusses each motion, straw polls or votes taken
  • Result: Clear regional conscience on each motion
  • Example timing: March 15, 2026 assembly → RD has conscience by late March

Method 2: Regular RSC Meetings

  • Who attends: RCMs and regional officers
  • When held: Regular monthly or bi-monthly RSC meetings (January-March)
  • Purpose: Ongoing discussion and conscience formation
  • Process: RCMs share area consciences over multiple meetings, discuss, form consensus
  • Result: Progressive refinement of regional conscience
  • Example timing: January RSC (initial discussion) → February RSC (more discussion) → March RSC (final conscience)

Method 3: Written Input Compilation

  • Process: RCMs submit written summaries of area consciences
  • Compilation: RD or regional secretary compiles all input
  • Discussion: May happen via email, conference calls, or at RSC meeting
  • Result: RD has comprehensive view of regional perspectives

Method 4: Hybrid Approach

  • Combination of regular RSC meetings AND special assembly
  • Ongoing discussion at RSC, final conscience at assembly
  • Virtual participation options for remote areas
  • Both written input and in-person discussion

What Delegates Do With Regional Conscience

Before the Initial Straw Poll:

  • Review regional conscience on all motions
  • Understand not just the "yes/no" but the reasoning
  • Note any minority opinions or concerns
  • Consider nuances in regional discussion
  • Participate in straw poll representing regional conscience

At the World Service Conference:

  • Represent regional perspective: Share regional conscience in discussions
  • Listen to other perspectives: Hear from delegates representing different experiences
  • Consider the whole: Think about what's best for NA worldwide, not just their region
  • Participate in consensus-building: Work toward decisions that serve common welfare
  • Use informed discretion: Delegates aren't messengers—they're trusted servants

Important Distinction:

From A Guide to World Services in NA: "The delegate is selected by the region's group representatives and/or RCMs to act, collectively with other participants, in the best interests of NA as a whole, not solely as an advocate of their NA community's priorities."

This means delegates:

  • Are NOT mere messengers voting exactly as told
  • DO represent their region's conscience and perspective
  • ALSO consider what's best for NA as a whole
  • PARTICIPATE in consensus-seeking, not just vote-counting

What If Regional Conscience Is Split or Unclear?

It's common for regions to have divided opinions on some issues. When this happens:

Delegates Should:

  • Honestly represent the diversity of opinion
  • Share the range of perspectives in discussions
  • Note areas of agreement and disagreement
  • Use their best judgment informed by regional discussion
  • Participate in consensus-building at WSC

Delegates Should NOT:

  • Make up or fabricate a "conscience" that doesn't exist
  • Only represent the majority view and ignore minority opinions
  • Vote their personal opinion when region is clearly opposed
  • Refuse to participate because region had no consensus

Example: If a region's areas are split 60/40 on a motion, the delegate might say in discussion: "My region had extensive discussion on this. About 60% of our groups support the motion because [reasons], while 40% have concerns about [issues]. After hearing discussion here, I believe the modified approach addresses our region's concerns."

Other Deadlines for Regional Input

April 1, 2026: CAR Survey and Discussion Questions

  • Regions submit collective CAR Survey responses
  • Regions submit input on discussion questions (gender-neutral language, DRT/MAT)
  • Both should reflect regional/zonal conscience
  • Survey helps prioritize projects; discussion input informs WSC sessions

February 28, 2026: Regional Reports

  • Not about CAR conscience, but about regional activities and statistics
  • Helps World Services understand Fellowship health and needs
  • Becomes part of historical record

Tips for Effective Conscience Collection

For Groups:

  • Start discussing CAR early (December-January)
  • Give GSR clear, documented conscience
  • Include reasoning, not just yes/no
  • Note any concerns or questions
  • Don't wait until the last minute

For Areas:

  • Provide time at area meetings for CAR discussion (January-March)
  • Compile group consciences for RCM
  • Don't pressure for artificial consensus
  • Document diversity of opinion
  • Get information to regional level early

For Regions:

  • Schedule regional assembly or final RSC well before April 18
  • Allow time for discussion, not just vote-taking
  • Make sure delegate understands the "why" not just the "what"
  • Consider both in-person and virtual participation options
  • Build in buffer time before deadlines

What Happens After the Conference?

After WSC 2026, the flow reverses:

  • RD reports back to region: What was decided and why
  • RCMs share at areas: WSC outcomes and implications
  • GSRs report to groups: Final decisions and next steps
  • Conference Report published: Complete record of all decisions
  • Work begins: Approved projects move forward

This completes the cycle of conscience flowing up and information flowing back down, ensuring that groups remain informed and connected to NA's worldwide service efforts.

19 Do delegates vote at the WSC the way their region tells them to, or can they vote differently?

This is one of the most important and sometimes misunderstood aspects of how the World Service Conference works. The answer is nuanced and rooted in NA's spiritual principles of service.

The Short Answer

Delegates are NOT mere messengers who must vote exactly as their region directs. They ARE trusted servants who represent their region's perspective while also considering the best interests of NA as a whole.

What the Guidelines Say

From A Guide to World Services in NA:

"The regional delegate serves as the primary contact between NA's World Services and the local NA community. On one hand, the delegate provides information on current World Services projects to the regional committee. On the other, the delegate provides a local perspective to the work of World Services."

"During the delegate's term, they attend the World Service Conference and virtual conference participants web meetings as fully active participants, for while the delegate is elected by and accountable to the regional assembly or RSC, they are not a mere messenger. The delegate is selected by the region's group representatives and/or RCMs to act, collectively with other participants, in the best interests of NA as a whole, not solely as an advocate of their NA community's priorities."

Why Delegates Aren't "Messengers"

The Consensus-Based Process:

The World Service Conference uses consensus-based decision making (CBDM), not simple vote-counting. This process involves:

  • Extensive discussion among all participants
  • Sharing of perspectives from different parts of the world
  • Building understanding and unity
  • Seeking solutions that serve NA as a whole
  • Sometimes modifying or amending proposals based on discussion

A delegate who could only vote exactly as pre-instructed couldn't meaningfully participate in this process.

New Information Emerges:

At the conference, delegates may hear:

  • Information their region didn't have when forming conscience
  • Perspectives from NA communities with very different circumstances
  • Unintended consequences of a motion that weren't initially apparent
  • Proposed amendments that address regional concerns
  • Spiritual insights from the group conscience process

Our Common Welfare:

Tradition One reminds us: "Our common welfare should come first; personal recovery depends on NA unity." Delegates must consider:

  • What serves NA as a whole, not just their region
  • Impact on communities very different from theirs
  • Long-term consequences for the Fellowship
  • Unity and the greater good

The Delegate's Responsibility

Delegates Should:

  • Arrive informed: Knowing their region's conscience thoroughly
  • Represent regional perspective: Share regional thinking in discussions
  • Listen with an open mind: Consider other viewpoints seriously
  • Participate fully: Engage in consensus-building process
  • Exercise informed judgment: Make decisions based on all available information
  • Consider the whole: Think about what's best for NA worldwide
  • Be accountable: Explain their decisions when they return to region

Delegates Should NOT:

  • Ignore regional conscience: Regional perspective is important
  • Vote purely personal preference: When region has clear conscience
  • Refuse to participate: Because they disagree with regional position
  • Act as rubber stamp: Without considering discussion at WSC
  • Advocate only for their region: At expense of NA as a whole

Real-World Scenarios

Scenario 1: Clear Regional Conscience Supported by Discussion

  • Region strongly supports a motion (85% in favor)
  • WSC discussion reinforces regional reasoning
  • No new information changes the picture
  • Delegate action: Votes in support, consistent with regional conscience

Scenario 2: Amendment Addresses Regional Concerns

  • Region opposed motion (70% against) due to specific concern
  • Amendment is proposed that addresses that exact concern
  • Amended motion aligns with regional values/principles
  • Delegate action: Supports amendment and votes for amended motion, explaining to region later how amendment addressed their concerns

Scenario 3: New Information Changes Context

  • Region supported motion based on limited information
  • At WSC, significant unintended consequences revealed
  • Other regions share serious problems this would cause
  • Delegate realizes motion would actually harm NA as a whole
  • Delegate action: Participates in discussion to improve motion, or votes against if problems can't be resolved, then explains reasoning to region

Scenario 4: Split Regional Conscience

  • Region divided 55/45 on an issue
  • No clear consensus either way
  • WSC discussion helps clarify issues
  • Delegate action: Shares both perspectives from region in discussion, then votes based on what seems best for NA as a whole after hearing all viewpoints

Scenario 5: Strong Regional Conscience, But Delegate Sees Bigger Picture

  • Region strongly opposed to something (80% against)
  • Regional opposition based on impact to their community
  • At WSC, delegate hears from developing communities that desperately need this
  • Delegate recognizes regional position serves local interest, not common welfare
  • Delegate action: Very difficult situation. Delegate might:
    • Work to amend motion to address regional concerns AND serve developing communities
    • Vote conscience and explain thoroughly to region afterward
    • Or, if regional opposition is overwhelming and reasonable, represent that even while advocating for compromise

Accountability and Trust

Delegates Are Accountable:

  • Must report back to region after WSC
  • Should explain decisions, especially any different from regional conscience
  • Can be removed by region if they consistently fail to represent regional perspective
  • Expected to maintain communication throughout their term

Regions Must Trust:

  • Delegates' integrity and judgment
  • The consensus-based process at WSC
  • That delegates are seeking Higher Power guidance
  • The spiritual principles of service

The Spiritual Foundation:

This isn't about delegates doing whatever they want. It's about recognizing that:

  • Group conscience at WSC may reveal things regional conscience didn't consider
  • NA's unity depends on considering the whole, not just parts
  • We elect trusted servants, not messengers
  • Spiritual principles guide us to look beyond our own interests
  • Higher Power works through the collective conscience at WSC

What This Means for Groups and Areas

When Forming Conscience:

  • Focus on principles, not just immediate impact on your community
  • Consider how decisions affect NA worldwide
  • Trust your delegate to participate fully in WSC process
  • Provide reasoning along with yes/no, so delegate understands "why"
  • Include concerns and questions, not just directives

After the Conference:

  • Listen to delegate's report with open mind
  • Ask questions to understand their decisions
  • Recognize they had information you didn't have
  • Evaluate based on their service to NA as a whole, not just following orders
  • Provide feedback to help them serve better

The Balance

The delegate's role requires a delicate balance:

Regional Perspective ←→ Worldwide Perspective
Represent regional conscience Balanced Consider common welfare
Share local experience With Listen to global experience
Voice regional concerns While Seeking solutions for all
Accountable to region And Responsible to Fellowship

This balance is what makes the World Service Conference work effectively. Delegates who are mere messengers can't participate in true consensus-building. Delegates who ignore their regions can't truly represent the Fellowship. The spiritual middle ground—trusted servants who listen, learn, and act in good faith for our common welfare—is what serves NA best.

Additional Resources

Key Websites

Contact Information

Publications Available

For Questions

Contact your regional delegate, zonal delegate, or reach out directly to NA World Services via the World Service Office or email the World Board at worldboard@na.org.